<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Design Reviews &#187; animation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.designreviews.co.uk/tag/animation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.designreviews.co.uk</link>
	<description>Reviews Design</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Jun 2010 16:38:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>To 3D or not to 3D?</title>
		<link>http://www.designreviews.co.uk/2008/10/to-3d-or-not-to-3d/</link>
		<comments>http://www.designreviews.co.uk/2008/10/to-3d-or-not-to-3d/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Oct 2008 14:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[general]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[3D]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[animation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[illustrator]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[isometric]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[logo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[perspective]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtyson.co.uk/?p=34</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Is 3D in the non-interactive and non-animated design side of things a bit stale and shopworn? It seems so, even clients have asked &#8220;no 3D effects&#8221;, not that I wanted to do any&#8230; So it seems like it&#8217;s a thing to avoid, a furry dice of the graphic design world now. In fact there has [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is 3D in the non-interactive and non-animated design side of things a bit stale and shopworn?</p>
<p>It seems so, even clients have asked &#8220;no 3D effects&#8221;, not that I wanted to do any&#8230; So it seems like it&#8217;s a thing to avoid, a furry dice of the graphic design world now. In fact there has been a consciously flat movement for many years, flat colours, no gradients, no shadows and no 3D. However it seems perspective effects are still quite popular and <a title="Cool isometric pixel art" href="http://www.zoggles.co.uk/asp/tutorials.asp?tut=1" target="_blank">isometric</a> effects have been cool for a few years. What do you think, is 3D often used to <a title="Politics?!?! Not here." href="http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,1840392,00.html?imw=Y" target="_blank">put lipstick on a pig</a>?</p>
<script type="text/javascript">
  addthis_url    = 'http%3A%2F%2Fwww.designreviews.co.uk%2F2008%2F10%2Fto-3d-or-not-to-3d%2F';
  addthis_title  = 'To+3D+or+not+to+3D%3F';
  addthis_pub    = '';
</script><script type="text/javascript" src="http://s7.addthis.com/js/addthis_widget.php?v=12" ></script>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.designreviews.co.uk/2008/10/to-3d-or-not-to-3d/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
